Blog

https://www.energylawreport.com/

The Energy Law Report is published by Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP’s Energy Practice Group. The blog is devoted to current legal issues and trends in the energy industry and is designed for readers to quickly and easily learn about the latest legal developments impacting producers, investors, transporters and governing organizations.

Recent Blog Posts

  • Does “other minerals” language in Ohio deeds include oil and gas? It depends. Earlier this year, Ohio’s Court of Appeals for the Seventh District weighed in on the question of whether “other minerals” in a deed included oil and gas. The answer is, essentially, it depends. The presumption under Ohio law is that “other minerals” in deeds does include oil and gas, but that presumption can be overcome. In reaching that conclusion in O’Brandovich v. Hess Ohio Devs., LLC, the Court of Appeals walked through and provided the rationale behind the facts and outcomes... More
  • “Stranger to the deed” not a defense to rights of first refusal in West Virginia In a June 4, 2021, decision, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals determined that the defense of “stranger to the deed” did not apply to invalidate rights of first refusal contained in deeds in West Virginia. The common law concept of “stranger to the deed,” with feudal roots, invalidates any deed reservation or exception in favor of someone not identified as a grantor or grantee in that deed. For example, if a deed from grantor “Mr. Smith” to grantee “Ms.... More
  • “At the wellhead” royalty language authorizes net-back method in Pennsylvania Giving the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Kilmer decision broad construction, Judge William Stickman of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granted the lessees’ motion to dismiss and issued a decision affirming that royalty language containing the phrase “at the wellhead” permits the lessee to use the net-back method and deduct post-production expenses. Rejecting the lessor’s argument that Kilmer should be limited to cases involving Pennsylvania’s Guaranteed Minimum Royalty Act, the court concluded that “Kilmer cannot be read so... More
  • Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds abandonment analysis improper where oil and gas lease provided remedies for conduct at issue In a six-to-one decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and held that a decision finding an oil and gas lease to be abandoned pursuant to the equitable doctrine of abandonment was improper where the lease provided remedies for the allegedly-wrongful conduct of the lessee. “Analysis of the trial court and Superior Court opinions in this case reveals an essential initial step was skipped to determine whether the case properly sounded in equity as to be resolvable employing the... More
  • Court holds recording of deeds starts statute of limitations running Recently, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania relied on the statute of limitations to dismiss claims related to allegedly improper transactions involving real estate. Although the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, it can be asserted in a motion to dismiss if the defense clearly appears on the face of the complaint and the complaint demonstrates that the claims were filed beyond the applicable time period. In this case (PR Liquidating Trust v. W. Land... More
  • Pennsylvania’s UTPCPL does not apply to acquiring oil and gas leases from property owner In a decision issued March 24, 2021, all seven of Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court justices agreed (in a split decision) that Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL) can be enforced only against sellers. In so concluding, the six-justice majority then determined that oil and gas companies are not “sellers” under the UTPCPL when they acquire oil and gas leases from property owners. Case background The case arose out of a lawsuit brought by the Pennsylvania Attorney General on behalf of... More
  • Texas power outages threaten mass litigation: Should potential defendants be shaking in their cowboy boots? Winter Storm Uri left millions in Texas without electricity and water in mid-February 2021, opening up threats of mass litigation.  Texans seek to hold the state’s primary grid operator, Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) and electricity retailers liable. Among the litigation is a $100 million suit brought by family members of an 11-year-old boy and 95-year-old man who both froze to death during the storm. Additionally, a class action suit against ERCOT alleging gross negligence has been filed in... More
  • Ohio Supreme Court wraps up 2020 by repeatedly reminding state agencies to stay in their statutory lanes Recent decisions issued by the Ohio Supreme Court have provided reminders that there are meaningful limits to the jurisdiction and powers of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) and other state agencies. Those challenging the final orders and decisions of Ohio’s various state commissions and agencies often find themselves facing a steep uphill climb. In addition to demonstrating prejudicial error, such challengers face entrenched doctrines of judicial deference to agency decision-making. However, four key decisions in late 2020 regarding meter-data-management,... More
  • From the editors: New name and expanded focus Porter Wright has provided advice and industry insight to our energy clients and to the broader community for decades. In order to accurately reflect the scope of our experience and capabilities, and to continue to provide the latest energy-related updates and information in an easily accessible way, we have expanded and relaunched our Oil & Gas Law Report blog as the Energy Law Report. We will now feature our writing on energy industry-related topics in one easily accessible blog that... More
  • Ohio Supreme Court holds that the Marketable Title Act and the Dormant Mineral Act both apply to severed oil and gas interests The Ohio Supreme Court has finally put to rest a long-standing debate about whether Ohio’s Marketable Title Act (MTA), Dormant Mineral Act (DMA), or both, may be applied to reunite severed mineral interests with the overlying surface estate. In a majority opinion decided Dec. 2, 2020, the court held that both acts may be independently applied to mineral estates. The court held, “The Marketable Title Act and the Dormant Mineral Act afford independent procedures, either of which may be used... More